Ever feel like anesthesiologists are not appreciated by patients or other hospital staff? At this time of year, the lack of recognition is particularly acute. While surgeons and internists receive gifts by the truckload, the anesthesiologist almost always receives nothing. Hell, even the nurses usually get some sort of card acknowledging their care while the patient was in the hospital. We just go on doing our routine and try to suppress our urge to scream at the top of our lungs, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!"
If you think this is an isolated feeling, now there is a book that recognizes this ingratitude. In Time.com, author David Zweig has written, "Invisibles: The Power of Anonymous Work In An Age of Relentless Self-Promotion." People with these kinds of under-appreciated jobs share three character traits: ambivalence toward recognition," "meticulousness," and "savoring of responsibility." He mentions several professions that work in the background but are essential for the ultimate success of the endeavor.
For instance, cinematographers of movies are frequently overshadowed by their more flamboyant directors. Structural engineers are essential in making sure buildings will remain intact under adverse conditions. Yet it is the architect who gains the most publicity for a building design. I'm sure you can name at least one famous architect, from Frank Lloyd Wright to I.M. Pei, but can you name their structural engineers?
Then there is the anesthesiologist. Always in the shadow of the surgeon, the anesthesiologist is never the doctor spotlighted in TV and movies. And if they are, it's usually as some drug addled addict endangering the patient until the surgeon comes to the rescue. As Dr. Alberto Scarmato told the author, "It's funny how on TV the surgeon is the leader of the OR, but in reality, during an emergency they're often the ones freaking out, looking to me for assurance."
So if you're the kind of person who always wants the limelight and accolades for your work, anesthesiology is not for you. We anesthesiologists are satisfied knowing we do our jobs well every day and our patients leave the operating room safely without any drama. Instead of seeking all the attention, we just console ourselves with the fact that we make more money than our general surgeons.
The great tax reform bill has now passed Congress and is on its way to the White House for President Trump's signature. While it lowers taxes for nearly everybody, it left a lump of coal for so called pass through businesses who use an S corporation tax structure. Specifically it doesn't allow professionals like doctors, lawyers, and accountants to benefit from the lower corporate tax rates given to other businesses. This was a deliberate act by Congress since their feeling was that we're not really aiding the economy like a widget manufacturer does. Screw you Congressional Republicans.
However, the bill lowers the tax rate of C corporations down to 21%, same as other businesses that got the lower corporate tax rate. Since many physicians have structured themselves as S corporations, should they now switch to a C corp instead to capture the lower rate?
I find the nuances between an S corp and a C corp very confusing. I am no tax expert at all. I've never even tried to do my own taxes on TurboTax. Therefore I went to Google CPA and looked up several articles on this issue. I found the most helpful article in Accounting Today. The desktop website requires a free registration to read but surprisingly the mobile site is open. This is what I've learned.
An S corp pays its taxes on the owner's individual tax rate, which in high income professions is currently 39.6%. A C corp pays taxes using the corporate tax rate, which is 35%. When it pays dividends to its shareholders, the shareholder has to pay taxes on that, which is 20% plus Medicare taxes, another 3.8%. Now that we have the basics down, let's compare the tax implications for both structures.
If your S corp earns a profit of $1,000,000, the taxes on it is based on the owner's 39.6% rate which would leave a net income of $604,000. If it's a C corp, the $1,000,000 will pay a corporate tax of $350,000. The remaining profit of $650,000 is then paid out as a dividend to its shareholders, who pay a 23.8% tax, leaving $495,300. Clearly an S corporation is more advantageous prior to the tax changes.
Let's see what happens now with the new tax law going into effect. In the S corp, that $1,000,000 profit will pay the owner's individual tax rate of 37%, leaving them with a net profit of $630,000. So yes the law helps your income just a teeny little bit as Congress promised. If the physician decides to switch to a C corp, the $1,000,000 profit will pay a corporate tax of 21%, or $210,000, leaving $790,000 to distribute as dividends. The dividend is then taxed at the same 23.8% as before since Congress didn't change those laws. That will leave a net income of $602,000.
So if you were a C corp before, the new tax laws will give you a tremendous boost in your net income, over $100,000 per year in this hypothetical situation. However if you're currently an S corporation, the decrease in the top individual tax bracket helps offset the decreased corporate tax rate the C corp enjoys. The S corp still winds up with a higher net income.
One also has to consider any potential new changes in the tax laws in the future. As it stands now, these individual tax rates are set to expire in ten years, reverting back to the old brackets. Who knows what a future Congress will do to the corporate tax rates too even though it's written to be permanent. Congressional Democrats are already threatening to changes the tax laws again next year if they win Congressional majorities. You don't want to be writing new corporate books every year at the whim of Congress.
Now this is just the most basic calculation I gleaned from the internet. I'm sure there are hundreds of tax minutia that I haven't taken into account. That's why it's still important to consult your accountant or tax attorney before making any leap in your business structure. Good luck.
Spoiler alert! Do not read any further if you haven't seen The Last Jedi and don't want to have any surprises revealed. If you don't really give a crap about Star Wars then there's no point in continuing this article either.
After watching The Last Jedi, were you confused by some of the plot turns? Was General Leia's ability to fly through space without any protective gear too much Guardians of the Galaxy for you? How did Luke send an avatar across lightyears of space to battle Kylo Ren? Was it really necessary to see Kylo without a shirt, the first time there was semi nudity in a Star Wars film? (Princess Leia's metal bikini in Return of the Jedi doesn't count.) I was certainly confounded by some of the scenes that I had just witnessed this past weekend at the movie theater. Well now the movie director explains some of his thinking in putting together this latest episode of the space saga.
The LA Times has a conversation with Rian Johnson, the director of the movie. In it, he reveals that there is a keeper of the Force lore at Lucas Films by the name of Pablo Hidalgo. Anytime the director needed one of the characters to stretch the capabilities of the Force, Hidalgo would be consulted. If he agreed that, yes Snoke can make a mental connection between two other people across space-time, then it could be added to the movie. Johnson also explains why Snoke, thought to be the new Emperor of the Dark Side, can be so easily and quickly killed off with barely a fight. And yes he talks about why it was necessary to see Kylo beefcake in the movie.
Check it out. Lots of questions are answered in the article.
A charge nurse in a Beverly Hills surgery center has sued her former employer for abuse suffered at the hands of a surgeon at the facility. Paula Rickey, a nurse at the 90210 Surgery Center in Beverly Hills, has sued Dr. Kerry Assil, an ophthalmologist at the ASC, and Cedars-Sinai Health Systems, the center's corporate affiliate, with battery, sexual harassment, and discrimination in LA County Superior Court.
The alleged incident took place July 17, 2017. On video surveillance, Dr. Assil can be seen walking behind Ms. Rickey and hitting her on the back of her head. He reported grabbed her arm and told her, "I know I can do this because I know you like the abuse."
When she complained to her supervisors, the incident was reviewed by the hospital's board of directors and she was moved to a different floor. Eventually she had her hours reduced and was soon let go. She claims that despite Dr. Assil's reputation for arrogance and philandering with female employees, he was the ASC's medical director and brought a lot of business to the office. Thus he barely received a wrist slap for his behavior. The fact that other people are seen in the video just walking by the two of them as if nothing has happened shows how chronic this behavior must have been in the operating rooms.
Dr. Assil is one of those celebrity physicians frequently found in Beverly Hills. They can be seen on daytime talk shows espousing their knowledge to a national audience while drumming up more business for themselves. They are unlikely to be sanctioned by a hospital board as long as they keep bringing in well paying patients. Sometimes even having cameras in the OR's are not enough to bring justice to those abused.
Ever wonder what they do over at the American Society of Anesthesiologists headquarters besides counting money from membership fees and organizing office staff birthday parties? Apparently they have been busy with a new project at rebranding the society's image. If you are an ASA member, you should have received an email from Dr. James Grant, the society's president, explaining their new project.
Dr. Grant explains that the previous logo for the ASA, an ECG rhythm that shows a normal QRS complex fading into asystole superimposed over an igloo like image, didn't really represent all the work that anesthesiologists do to improve safety. Plus the logo looked ugly on computer and phone screens.
Therefore they have designed four new logos and asked the membership to help them choose. The email has a link to the survey. Here are the choices in case you haven't had a chance to fill out the survey.
Right off the bat, personally I would eliminate the lighthouse logo. If you google "lighthouse logo," you will see dozens of companies with logos that look very similar to that image. Nothing about it says anesthesiologists other than anesthesiologists like to go out sailing on weekends in their yachts and know how to navigate around lighthouses.
The red molecular structure looks like the ASA is some sort of molecular chemistry organization. I'm not sure how it pertains to our goals for patient safety and advocacy. If the ASA wants people to think we are just a bunch of nerds, this would be it. Otherwise I'll pass.
The last two are a bit more difficult for me to decide because they're both more abstract. The two triangles pointing at each other looks like some sort of point-counterpoint forces butting up against each other. Surgeons vs anesthesiologist? Anesthesiologist vs CRNA? I see tension and conflict there, not cooperation for a common goal to protect patient health.
The last one is the most abstract. The first thing I thought of when I saw it was the movie "The Matrix". You know the scenes with the waterfall of green digital data? Yeah that's what those random lines and dots remind me of. There is nothing wrong with the ASA trying to associate itself with one of the coolest sci fi movies in the last twenty years. But the severity of the abstraction may leave many people scratching their heads.
That's my two cents on our choices for a new ASA logo. Take part in this great democracy of ours and fill out the survey. I'm curious what the final choice will turn out to be, or if they even stick with these four designs.
At this time of the year, it's easy to forget how lucky we are to live in a developed Western country with all of its luxuries and amenities. We don't think twice about attending yet another office Christmas party or private dinner party and dumping the leftover food into the trash can. We vow we will control ourselves in the new year and make another feeble attempt to lose weight.
Yes it's easy to forget that there are millions, even billions, of people around the world who are not as fortunate as us. The New York Times has a heartbreaking front page story about the horror facing the population of Venezuela. Over there, children by the thousands are dying of malnutrition.
In a country that has one of the largest oil reserves in the world, gross mismanagement and neglect by their government has caused massive food shortages and hyperinflation. Prices are expected to rise over 2,000% next year. Soldiers are stationed outside food stores to prevent looting. Dumpster diving takes on a whole new meaning when a restaurant closes for the night and crowds of people scramble for food that are thrown away.
The government blames economic sanctions by the United States and other Western countries for their suffering. They have stopped releasing health statistics to mask the real trauma facing its citizens. The doctors are overwhelmed by the epidemic of malnutrition. Most hospitals have run out of basics like infant formula that might alleviate the hunger of the babies that are brought to their emergency rooms every day.
So as the holiday festivities continue, just remember that we in the U.S. and other First World countries are the luckiest people to have ever lived in the history of the human population. Though we get bombarded daily by the latest outrage emanating from politicians and celebrities, the situation can always get drastically worse far faster than anyone can imagine. Millions of people in the world are living that nightmare at this very moment.
This is what happens to you when you're sitting in a cold operating room all day long. My hand looks like it's about 200 years old. The skin is all dry and cracked, occasionally bleeding through the cracks. Not only is the room extremely cold, causing vasoconstriction and poor perfusion of the skin, I'm also very dehydrated. When they made the rules about no food or beverages in the OR's, they didn't take into consideration the people who have to suffer under those rules. But what else is new? We're just here to work and do what we're told.
Besides the OR environment, other factors contributing to my advanced skin aging include the constant washing of our hands. The natural skin oils get washed away every time I clean them. Even when I put on skin lotion, it is gone after the next visit to the sink.
Then there is the Joint Commission requirement that we have to Purell our hands after every single encounter with a patient. This often leads to Purelling several times an hour. Since Purell is mainly alcohol based, it feels like rubbing ice on my hands each time.
Add in the really dry winter air in Los Angeles, which is currently contributing to our epidemic wildfires this season, and what you have is a perfect storm for drying out and mummifying my hands.
Would it really be so detrimental for the OR's to raise the room temperatures? Would patients really suffer massive infection complications if we brought a water bottle into the room? Can we ease off on the epidemiology gestapo who surreptitiously monitor our hand washing techniques? Show me proof that all these maneuvers actually contribute to decreasing patient infections and complications. Somehow I suspect there is no such data available. We just keep on doing what we're doing because that's what we were told. I went through years of college and medical school for this?
Merritt Hawkins, a national physician recruiting and staffing firm, has a ringside seat to the physician jobs market. Their ability to recognize the need for doctors and capability of fulfilling those needs allows them to judge the market place better than most. The company has just published a white paper on what they see are the doctors who are most in demand at the moment.
Ranked by the percent of job openings relative to the total number of physicians in the field, MH has ranked Pulmonology as the most sought after medical field in the country. That is followed by Psychiatry, Dermatology, Family Medicine, and Neurology. What do those specialties have in common? They are either in primary care, which is always in demand, or in specialties with very low number of training programs, thus keeping their skills highly prized.
Where is Anesthesiology in this list? You'll have to look way, way, way down at the bottom of the graph. According to Merritt Hawkins, compared to the total number of practicing anesthesiologists, the number of job openings is only 0.11%. So for every 1,000 anesthesiologists working, there is only one job opening. Just one. Anesthesiology have the fewest job openings relative to the number of practicing specialists of all medical doctors. We are ranked just above Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner.
Now these numbers sound a bit suspect. It's not plausible that out of 50,000 anesthesiologists that are in the ASA, there are only 50 job openings. Or is it? The anesthesia residency programs keep adding more new anesthesiologists every year, currently well over 1,000 each Match Day. And the numbers are still rising. By comparison there are a little over 500 Pulmonary fellowships offered each year. With the population rapidly aging and their complicated pulmonary issues, it's no wonder pulmonologists are being eagerly recruited. The only way for that many new anesthesiologists to find jobs is if nearly the same number of anesthesiologists start retiring each year.
Even if the absolute numbers are not entirely accurate, anesthesiology's ranking relative to other physicians should make any anesthesiologist pause. There are only so many surgery sites for anesthesiologists to work. With the constant encroachment of CRNA's, pretty soon we'll have to start competing with them directly for job openings. Will employers care that we have thousands of hours more training than the nurses or will they only look at the bottom line and lower the salary offered? In a true market economy, you already know the answer.
Shocking news. An anesthesiologist working at a plastic surgery center in Beverly Hills, CA has been charged with murder of his patient. Dr. Stephen Kyosung Kim was arrested for murder following the death of his patient, Dr. Mark Greenspan. Dr. Greenspan was undergoing surgery when the anesthesiologist reportedly gave him an overdose of Demerol. The patient suffered a cardiac arrest and died. What's even worse is that Dr. Kim was found to be injecting himself with narcotics during the procedure. Thus he was under the influence of drugs while he should have been watching over his patient.
News of physicians being charged with murder for their patients' deaths are extremely rare. They are usually accused of malpractice or negligence. For example, the anesthesiologist present when Joan Rivers died in New York was sued for malpractice, not murder.
Overdosing a patient and causing him to die is a pretty serious complication to begin with. But to also be under the influence of drugs at the same time makes this case almost indefensible. Dr. Kim has pleaded not guilty to his murder charge. We'll see if more details come out later at his trial.
Testing anesthetics have always involved subjecting animals to the different compounds and watching its effects. Either using cute little dogs or helpless tiny rodents, animal experimentation have brought a bad reputation to medical science. Now scientists have discovered that plants may be a substitute test subject for new anesthetics.
In the Annals of Botany, European and Japanese scientists used anesthesia to alter the growth and motion of various plants. Some plants were placed in a sealed chamber with a flask of ether. Others had their roots soaked in lidocaine. What they found was quite amazing.
Venus flytraps no longer clamped shut when their trigger hairs were stimulated. Pea plants maintained their curls and wouldn't grow straight until after the anesthetics were removed. Mimosa plants lost their ability to shut their leaves when physically touched.
They were able to measure a decrease in the action potential in the venus flytraps with exposure to anesthesia. After the ether was removed, the action potentials returned within a few hours. The researchers found other abnormalities in the cellular components when the plants were exposed to anesthesia.
Since we still have no clear idea how anesthesia works, this discovery could open up more pathways to understanding how these chemicals affect us without actually subjecting us to experimentation.
The proliferation of sexual assault and harassment stories that are pouring out of the news media is head spinning. Seems like half the front page of the New York Times is devoted to another sordid story about women being dehumanized by a male superior.
Though these headlines are just now making news because famous and powerful people are being named, unfortunately sexual assault is old news in the medical field. While doctors who are accused of sexual improprieties may not make national news, they are chronicled in the disciplinary actions of their state medical boards, which is public information.
The Medical Board of California publishes a quarterly newsletter of actions they've taken against physicians who have made questionable life choices or had severe run ins with the law. Here you'll find tales of drug abuse, fast money schemes, drunk driving, spousal abuse, and every other vice suffered by the rest of humanity.
Recently a plastic surgeon by the name of Gordon Roget, MD in Lodi, CA was brought to the Board's attention for sexual assault in 2015. This was a particularly sordid story of a vulnerable patient being helplessly assaulted by her doctor. Dr. Roget had a young woman who came to him for a labiaplasty. He kept asking her if she would like the procedure done under sedation. The patient said she wanted to be awake for it. Finally he relented and agreed to use local anesthetic only.
Without any female chaperones present, he placed her in stirrups and began the procedure. After he gave her the anesthetic, he put his fingers into her vagina with his face inches from her perineum. When she asked him if his fingers are supposed to be there, he asked, "You didn't like it?" He then stormed angrily out of the room and the patient heard noises like he was masturbating. She felt trapped in the room with an open wound and feet placed in a vulnerable position in the stirrups. When he came back, he hastily finished the procedure and told her to come back for a second procedure the following week. When she asked him to finish it all in one visit, he called her an "ungrateful bitch." She then got dressed and went to a local emergency room to have her wound properly treated. Dr. Roget lost his medical license in June 2017.
It is pathetic that doctors feel they can abuse their patients' trust just because they are in a supposed position of power. Who knows how many other female patients this plastic surgeon has abused. His words and actions suggest a pattern of behavior that has been well rehearsed. Let us clean up our own acts before the #MeToo movement focuses its unforgiving gaze on the house of medicine.
You think your anesthesia residency is bad? Just remember that you're not the only one suffering through these tortured years of relentless training. In the UK, the Royal College of Anaesthetists conducted a survey of their country's anesthesia (anaesthesia?) residents. Based on over 2000 responses, this was their finding:
Over three fourths of British anesthesia residents say that their work has had a detrimental effect on their physical health. A majority also say it's had a negative effect on their well being and mental health too. That could be because almost two thirds have missed a meal while at work and three quarters run around feeling dehydrated all day.
When they do finally have a chance to go home, over half of the residents have experienced a car accident or a near miss. A vast majority have felt so exhausted after a night call that they couldn't drive home. Maybe that's because only a third of them have call rooms to sleep in when they're at the hospital and only 18% get more than 30 minutes of rest at night. Consequently the Royal College of Anaesthetists fear up to 85% of their residents have a high risk for burnout.
How does this compare to American residents? Medscape had a survey of residents on this side of the pond and the results are similar. While the Medscape poll is for all residents, not just anesthesia, they found that over 80% felt they didn't have enough time to maintain their health and well being and nearly half have depression some or almost all of the time.
It doesn't look like there is much difference in attitudes in residents all over the world. Just remember that this is only a short temporary phase in one's career and you've got to keep your eyes on the prize. At the end of the road is one of the best jobs in America.
This story makes you realize your parents are so 20th century when they advised you on going to medical school. A 6 year old boy makes an estimated $11 million from his YouTube videos. That's right. Eleven freaking million dollars. What does he do on these videos? Nothing more than toy and children's food reviews. He has ten million subscribers to his channel and has been successfully doing this for only two years. That's less time than it takes to finish med school.
So next time you finish that 36 hour shift and drag yourself home to finish more charting, remember that the future belongs to bitcoin and YouTube advertising revenue. Old fashioned hard work and education are for suckers.
This is a truly terrifying finding in the Senate tax reform bill. Though this is only the Senate version and the final tax bill after reconciliation with the House plan could turn out to be very different, it's worth reading the fine print now.
According to analysis of the Senate bill, small business owners and people who make good money but are not the super rich could be on the hook for a marginal tax rate of greater than 100% on their income. What does that mean? It means that for every dollar you make over a certain tax threshold, you will owe more than one dollar to the government. That is literally the definition of a confiscatory tax rate.
How does something like that happen? It's rather complex and I haven't quite wrapped my head around it yet. That's why I have a CPA doing my taxes. First you have to be in a business that uses a pass through structure, like an S corporation, the way many small companies and physicians have their corporations set up. The special 23% rate for these corporations currently in the Senate bill slowly phases out after reaching an income of $624,000. Thus the corporation will face the full force of the top personal income tax bracket of 39%. Then if you live in a high tax state like the blue states on both coasts, the deduction for state and local taxes are going to be eliminated. Here in California the top tax bracket is 13.3%. After that various tax credits like the $2000 per child tax credits also phase out for high income earners. And don't forget to add the payroll tax such as Medicare. Voila. Pretty soon the most productive members of our profession are getting hit with taxes close to or greater than 100%.
While the majority of physicians don't make more than $625,000 per year, thousands of them do. The Senate bill is similar to the House version, which is biased against doctors with its refusal to grant a pass through tax cut for physicians. The House-Senate Joint Committee will be meeting this week to bring the two separate bills into agreement. They're hoping the final bill will be signed by President Trump before Christmas. It may be a very unmerry Christmas for many MDs this year.
When I wrote about why I chose anesthesiology as a career a few years ago, I received a few criticisms from readers complaining that I didn't actually choose anesthesiology. Instead I had settled on the field after eliminating all the other possibilities. Did I really become an anesthesiologist because I liked it or was it because I didn't like anything else?
In this month's issue of the ASA Monitor, the editor, Dr. N. Martin Giesecke writes about how he became an anesthesiologist (membership required). His path to his career epiphany was very similar to mine. However he had a little head start down that path since his father was also an anesthesiologist. Yet as a medical student he experienced different medical fields that made him think about other possibilities but ultimately led him to his current profession.
Dr. Giesecke related his admiration for pediatrics. However he didn't have the stomach for taking care of so many small helpless patients. Then he did a rotation in surgery, his first choice in medical school. Though he contemplated going into plastic surgery, the environment he encountered was off putting. He was disgusted by the hostile work environment and mental and physical abuse of the trainees, students and residents alike. That story sounds very familiar.
As part of his surgery rotation, he also did a few weeks in anesthesiology. That's when he realized how awful the surgeons are to their underlings and to each other. Anesthesiology by comparison was pleasant and collegial yet still academic and patient oriented. It was easy to make a decision at that point.
So as you can see, there is not one track to becoming an anesthesiologist. Everybody has a different story on how they made their career choice. Very few people actually decide from day one they're going to become anesthesiologists and not alter their plans. And that's okay. It's like serial dating. You Tinder a few specialties and finally settle on the right one for you.
Modern medicine has allowed the humane treatment of patients for over a century now. Yet we still know very little about how it works inside the body. Just recently there was a new proposal on the mechanisms for propofol's remarkable ability to induce sleep. Now there is a new theory on how the volatile anesthetics work to induce anesthesia.
Anesthesiology News details a new study on the mysterious mechanism of gas anesthesia in the body. Though volatile anesthetics have been in use for over 150 years, we know very little about how it actually works. The current theory is that the molecules of gas become absorbed by the bilipid cell membrane of neurons which alters its ability to propagate electrical signals, thus inducing sleep. Now this new paper puts a question mark to that long standing premise.
Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Dr. Karl Herold, chair of anesthesiology at New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, discovered that it may actually be cell membrane proteins such as ion channels altered by anesthesia that inhibit cell function instead of changes in the bilipid cell membrane. The researchers developed an artificial cell membrane with ion channels in place. Any change in the membrane would alter the flow of ions through the channels. When they immersed the model with therapeutic levels of volatile anesthetics, they discovered that there was not enough reshaping of the bilipid layer to cause inhibition of cell depolarization and signal propagation. Only at super therapeutic levels of anesthesia did they find a change in the cell membrane. Thus they theorize that it is unlikely that cell membrane changes are the source of anesthesia's effects on the human brain.
Though this study did not pinpoint an exact location for the mechanism of action of anesthetics, it at least disproved an old theory, which will allow researchers to move forward to find the real reason why we anesthesiologists can put patients to sleep, and perhaps someday develop even better anesthetics.
The University of Wisconsin, Madison's Department of Anesthesiology has one of the most storied programs in American medical history. They were pioneers in the field during its infancy and invented practices that were eventually adopted by anesthesiologists all over the country and the world. Yet it is being brought low by accusations of bias against women.
The Wisconsin State Journal details the problems in the department that were brought up during a "climate review" after Dr. Robert Pearce, the former department chair, resigned last July. The report noted multiple grievances among the female staff. They described the atmosphere within the department as a "good-old boy network."
The male staff significantly outnumber the women who mostly work part time. The women felt belittled when the men told them they are less committed to their profession because they take more time off to take care of family. Many of the female anesthesiologists who work at the American Family Children's Hospital felt insulted when their workplace was described as "the crying hospital" or "candyland." Female residents were told not to "rock the boat." CRNA's felt they were not valued in the department.
Oy! These are a lot of complaints that really don't seem justified in this male blogger's point of view. First of all, so what if the men outnumber the women by two to one? Must every single job have an equal distribution of the sexes to make it free from discrimination and bias? The truth is one can be harassed whether one is in the majority or minority in a group. Plenty of men have felt they were treated unfairly in their jobs by their male colleagues or superiors.
Let's face the facts here about women who work part time yet expect the same respect at work as men. Yes it's admirable that they want to go home and take care of our children so that we can continue to work hard for the family. But don't expect to get equal pay or get invited to departmental committees if one has to leave by 3:00 PM every day to pick up the kids. It wouldn't be fair to the men who toil away 12 hours a day at their jobs. No disrespect but you can't expect to get the same appreciation from your colleagues if you're only working half the time as others. In fact many of the female anesthesiologists in our department want to work part time. Some even leave our group to work at other hospitals that allow even greater time flexibility. That is no stigma against their dedication to their jobs when they are at work.
The other complaints just seem silly. Calling a children's hospital a crying hospital or candyland doesn't sound insulting, it sounds appropriately descriptive. Describing it as such doesn't demean the people who work there. Stop being so sensitive. Female residents shouldn't rock the boat? Why would you want to? As a resident all I wanted to do was finish my training and get the hell out so I can start my practice. Why would I want to make my life more difficult than it already was as a resident? CRNA's who don't feel valued by the doctors in the department? If they want to feel valued then they need to go get a medical degree.
The department is rectifying the situation by appointing a new female interim chair, Dr. Aimee Becker. While I'm sure Dr. Becker is a fantastic anesthesiologist, I can't help but feel that this was a very political choice to deflect the uproar over the report. When can we get past the sexual politics and just hire the best people for the job without counting how many X chromosomes are in one's DNA?
This past summer I got to witness one of the great natural wonders of the world, a total eclipse of the sun. It was one of those events that I have dreamed about my entire life. Though my view wasn't perfect due to heavy cloud cover that rolled in over our Midwestern location just as the eclipse took place, we got just enough clearing to see the corona. And to me that was a win. I will never forget the phenomenon and I hope my young son, who I brought along with me, will too.
Now there is an unfortunate woman in New York who may being seeing the solar eclipse forever, not just in her mind's eye, but permanently in her vision. An article in JAMA Ophthalmology written by solar retinopathy specialist Avnish Deobhakta (there really is such a sub subspecialty in ophtho?!), details the cautionary tale of this patient who was too eager to watch the eclipse without first getting the proper equipment.
The patient is a young woman in her 20's who decided she wanted to watch the eclipse at the last second. She stared at the blinding sun for about six seconds before she had to turn away. Then she decided to borrow a stranger's regular sunglasses and continued to stare at the partial eclipse for another 15-20 seconds. Within hours she was having visual difficulties.
When ophthalmologists examined her eyes with a special instrument that can see individual retinal cells, they found a perfectly shaped burn that corresponded to the partial eclipse she witnessed, including the crescent cutout made by the moon partially obstructing the sun. Six weeks later, she still has a hole in her vision where the retinal cells remain damaged.
Again this shows that one should pay heed to doctors' warnings. Physicians for weeks cautioned people to wear eclipse glasses or they could suffer permanent eye damage. Apparently some people just didn't get the message.
Think physicians are all well educated and unlikely to conduct obviously inappropriate behavior in the operating room? Not a chance. This blog has documented several cases of anesthesiologists behaving badly in the OR, including here and here. I'm not even going to talk about the deranged anesthesiologist who attacked Senator Rand Paul a few weeks ago. In this atmosphere of heightened awareness of sexual harassment and unacceptable conduct, every person should know by now that witnesses are more willing than ever to report any actions that they deem improper.
However this didn't stop a University of Wisconsin anesthesiologist from being forced to resign for his conduct. Dr. Mark Schroeder, a senior anesthesiologist at UW, was reported by the staff for frequently positioning himself where he isn't supposed to be. A staff member since 1984, it was reported by nurses and other staff that he "likes to be at the 'bottom of the bed' and 'see parts of a patient that he does not need to see.'"
Dr. Schroeder was reprimanded by the hospital for "inappropriate interactions with employees and patients." When his case was brought to the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board, he offered to turn in his medical license and retire.
What an ignominious ending to a long career. The Wisconsin State Journal doesn't mention whether he stood at the foot of the bed only for female patients or male or both. But regardless, anybody who has ever worked in the operating room knows that anesthesiologists rarely make a trip below the shoulder. Other than for putting in arterial lines or a regional block, we rarely venture past the waistline of patients. So if this doctor was regularly wandering his way down there while all the patient's monitors are up at the head of the bed, people know immediately this is not normal behavior. In light of all the sexual accusations that populate headlines daily, any suspicious activity can be construed as deviant. So keep that ether screen up and stay on your side of the blood-brain barrier if you want to maintain your good reputation with the staff.
This is what it's like to live in Los Angeles today. A major wildfire broke out early this morning next to the always busy 405 freeway, snarling traffic all over the Westside. It's unfortunate location was made worse by the fact it occurred at a particularly narrow portion of the freeway with steep cliffs on either side and no way to get off. Therefore the road was closed for miles before and after the fire.
Since this is in the popular and tony Westside, many of our patients and hospital staff live in the area. Consequently doctors are late for their procedures, patients are cancelling cases because they're evacuating their homes, and generally the traffic in this entire area has come to a standstill. Isn't LA grand?
Ok, there are some pretty impressive libraries in the world. The Library of Congress and the New York Public Library are definitely iconic. But this new library in China is almost out of this world futuristic. The Tianjin Binhai library east of Beijing has a unique architecture that needs to be seen in pictures to be appreciated.
The undulating walls can hold 1.2 million books. Right now the shelves are not nearly that full. Many of the "books" on the walls are just images placed there on aluminum plates until real books are eventually stacked there. Still, it is a very awe inspiring design. Maybe if my alma mater can show me something like this when they ask me for donations I would give more money to their library fund.
We could probably have deduced this one from experience. In a study published in JAMA Ophthalmology, researchers at Vanderbilt University have found that young physicians are much more likely to get complaints from patients than their older colleagues.
The retrospective paper looked at the experiences of 1342 ophthalmologists who practiced at Vanderbilt affiliated medical facilities. The ophthalmologists were grouped in cohorts of ten years of age, from 31-40 years old up to greater than 70 years old. Their records were reviewed from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2015. The median age of the doctors was 47 years old.
The results showed that the two youngest cohorts were statistically more likely to hear complaints from their patients. The youngest group were 2.36 times more likely to get a complaint while the next youngest cohort had 1.73 times higher risk relative to their older physicians. The younger doctors also had patients who complained more quickly about their problems than the older ones.
The researchers conclude that their findings are consistent with the medical malpractice environment where physicians with less than 10 years of practice are more likely to get sued than their older partners. Their malpractice insurance cost the most until it tapers off when they hit their mid career years. The physicians halfway through their careers may feel social, professional, and family pressure to work harder and see more patients. This leads to greater risk of getting patient complaints. The late career physicians are the ones who survived the burnout and legal difficulties of their earlier years. These doctors have demonstrated the skills and composure to to survive in the medical field and thus should have the fewest patient complaints and lowest malpractice liability.
So for all you medical students and residents out there who see nothing but bleakness and despair for the foreseeable future. Yes it does get better, eventually. You'll just have to survive the first 20-30 years of medical practice then you're golden. Don't you feel better now?
The general public often complains that doctors make too much money. But we know who are actually raking in the dough in medicine. And they usually don't take care of any actual patients. A report in the Wall Street Journal discloses that the chief executive of health insurance company Aetna may walk away with $500 million if his company gets bought by pharmacy company CVS.
The money will come in the form of stock options and personal stock holdings. CEO Mark Bertolini will receive $85 million in exit pay for selling the company. If the deal settles for the reported $207 per share, he will also get $230 million in stock options and his Aetna stake would be worth another $190 million.
Think about that for a minute or ten. While doctors are getting vilified for earning a decent living after decades of education and toil, insurance executives are being given nine figure incomes and bonuses for maximizing shareholder profits by denying insurance coverage to patients and reducing reimbursements for physicians. If healthcare reform is to succeed in this country, the insurance company gatekeepers need to be removed so that all those billions of profits will be properly distributed to the patients and their caretakers. It's immoral that insurance companies stand in the way of doctors properly treating their patients while they keep most of the healthcare industry profits.
Why are so many men masturbating in front of unwilling participants? The act of masturbation used to be considered shameful. It has been used to great comic effect in movies and TV, in everything from "American Pie" to "Seinfeld." Who wouldn't want to be the master of his domain?
But now it seems that a remarkably large number of well to do men have been forcing their self love onto others as a form of harassment and abuse. Every day another high powered man is accused of or confesses to touching themselves in full view of reluctant colleagues. The latest ones to be charged with this act include the great music maestro James Levine and California Assemblyman Matt Dababneh. This follows the infamous actions of Louis C.K. and the man now synonymous with sexual harassment, Harvey Weinstein.
I know that doctors have been trying for years to reeducate people to make masturbation a less shameful act. It is a natural activity that should not cause embarrassment of its practitioners, which is virtually everybody. However, after all these revelations, I'm inclined to side with our less enlightened ancestors and punish people who can't keep their hands off themselves in front of others. Can you imagine if the victim was allowed to flog the perpetrator for their abusive acts as in the olden days? It would put a real quick end to all these disgusting displays of power and toxic masculinity. Keep it in your pants or take them out only when you have a consenting partner present. Nobody else cares to see how little you respect yourself or others.