Friday, June 7, 2013
Anesthesiologists Are Not Physicians. My EMR Says So.
Hmm. Is the computer implying that anesthesiologists are not physicians? Why do anesthesiologists have a different line at all? The Physician lines make no distinction between attending surgeons, assistant surgeons, or surgical residents. Isn't that just as important to know when it comes to documenting who was working in the OR? Shouldn't there be a separate line for "Attending Surgeon", "Assistant Surgeon", and "Surgical Resident"? If our computer system doesn't really care about categorizing the physicians in the room, then why does it break out anesthesiologists as being separate from other physicians?
Also, why are we placed way down at the bottom of the list? Are we not deserving of a spot higher up on the screen? Instead our names are to be entered after all the nurses and just before the technologists. I say the EMR is dissing the anesthesia profession. I need to talk to our IT guys and give them an earful about the great medical field of anesthesiology. I guess I should just be thankful they used "Anesthesiologist" instead of just "Anesthesia". That would really raise my hackles.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I find it funny that a majority of anesthesiologists have the same name! I hear it in many rooms. "Hey! Anesthesia"...ReplyDelete
Speaking of names, sometimes you just can make up these names, a long time ago, had 2 drug reps. The Astra rep for local anesthetics was named "Anastasia". And Janssen, makers of Fentanyl, aka "Sublimaze" and its brother and sister drugs, Alfenta and Sufenta, their rep was named, "Hal Renta". "Hi, Hal Renta for Sufenta". If Great Zs allows this out, Hi to Hal and Anastasia, and yes, I still don't like talking to drug reps...ReplyDelete
I will point out that the order of the rows in that flowsheet and the labels on each row are completely within the control of your hospital's clinical systems team. Give 'em a call.ReplyDelete