Another aspect of the story in the New York Times about a heroic 43 hour surgery really bothers, no angers, me. Besides the enormous expense of this procedure for questionable long term benefits, on a more personal note this article barely mentions the anesthesiologists involved in the care.
Toward the end of the surgery, when the liver was reimplanted, the operating team encountered some serious difficulties:
The liver bled profusely. Transfusions could barely keep up. Over the next few hours he needed 30 pints of blood. But even as the bleeding abated, his blood pressure and body temperature dropped, and his blood turned dangerously acidic. Drugs to correct one problem made others worse. He was sinking into a vicious cycle that could kill him.
Who was there giving all the transfusions, and the pressors, and other life saving maneuvers to try to salvage this 43 hour operation and the patient's life? There is not a mention of the work of the anesthesiologists at this critical juncture in the operation. It's as if all those interventions happened by magic. There is a single quote from an anonymous anesthesiologist in the entire article. Of course he, or she we will never know, is talking about the surgeon, describing him as having "soft hands." Blech.
On the 8th photo of the slide show, they actually described what the anesthesiology team was doing during the operation: